> Inglés
> Francés
> Italiano
El lugar de encuentro de los católicos en la red
 
 
Tus Favoritos   |   Página de Inicio   |   Recomiéndanos   |   Opiniones   |   Suscríbete
Sacerdotes | comunidad
Sacerdos. English | categoría
Magazine Archive | tema
Autor: John Wang | Fuente: Sacerdos
Mary’s Perpetual Virginity
Mary’s Perpetual Virginity explained
 

Mary’s Perpetual Virginity
Only the Lord entered this gate


In declaring Mary’s perpetual virginity, the Church not only affirms that our Blessed Mother is biologically a virgin before Jesus’ birth, during his birth and afterwards, but also that she dedicated her entire life to serving the Lord with total moral integrity and perfect chastity. In this article we will discuss under three sections the virginity of the Mother of Jesus. First, Mary was a virgin when she conceived Jesus, virginitas ante partum. Second, she maintained her virginity during Jesus’ birth, in partu. Finally, Mary conserved her virginity all her life after his birth, post partum.

Virgin before Jesus’ birth
Sacred Scripture teaches this truth; tradition holds it; we profess it in our Creed and celebrate it in our liturgy.
In 7:14 of the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, we read: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you this sign: The virgin shall be with child, and bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel.” The Hebrew word almah (parthenos in Greek) used here by Isaiah is found six other times in the Old Testament (Gen 24:43; Exod 2, 8; Ps 67:26; Song 1:3; 6:7; Prov 30:19), all of them meaning virgin. In this passage Isaiah was announcing something extraordinary and admirable, a virginal conception. A virginal conception and birth are miraculous events. Conception through ordinary human sexual relations is certainly nothing extraordinary.
St. Matthew narrates the birth of Jesus: “Now this is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about. When his mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, but before they lived together, she was found with child through the Holy Spirit. Joseph her husband, since he was a righteous man and was unwilling to expose her to shame, decided to divorce her quietly. Such was his intention when, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, ‘Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife into your home. For it is through the Holy Spirit that this child has been conceived in her.’” Matthew continues: “All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: ‘Behold, the virgin shall be with child and bear a son, and they shall name him Emmanuel,’ which means ‘God is with us’” (Matt 1:18-23).
St. Luke wrote: “In the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a town of Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph, of the house of David, and the virgin’s name was Mary.” Later on, the angel told the virgin Mary: “Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus.” When Mary asked for an explanation, the angel replied: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you … for nothing will be impossible for God” (Luke 1:26-38). This passage provides the basis of our belief, that Jesus was conceived not through human means but by the power of the Holy Spirit. So God’s words prove beyond doubt that our Blessed Mother was a virgin and her virginity remained intact in conceiving Jesus.
The Fathers and doctors of the Church unanimously defend Jesus’ virginal conception. St. Ignatius Martyr wrote: “From the beginning of the world, three great mysteries remained hidden, the virginity of Mary, the birth and death of our Lord.” St. Justin, St. Irenaeus, St. Ephraim, St. Gregory, St. Epiphanius, St. Augustine, St. Leo the Great, Tertullian and Origen all defended Mary’s virginity. To quote St. Epiphanius: “Holy is our Savior, who descended from heaven, worked our salvation from the womb of the virgin, was born from the same virgin, conceived by the Holy Spirit.” St. Lactantius wrote: “It is not fitting that the Son of God should have two fathers, one eternal and one temporal. As God, Jesus had no mother, and likewise as man, Jesus had no father.” St. Thomas Aquinas was of the opinion that Jesus’ conception and birth did not damage the virginity of Mary, but rather purified and ennobled it, just as when the Word of God was begotten from his Father, he did not dishonor but showed the Father’s infinite and most pure fecundity. St. Peter Canisius reasoned that since Jesus was mankind’s redeemer, he should not be born like the rest of us, inheriting Adam’s sins. All born from Adam are born from concupiscence and need redemption. And for St. Leo the Great, Jesus’ conception and birth were so pure and immaculate through the work of the Holy Spirit that they are a model of our rebirth through the water of baptism. St. Ambrose compares Jesus with Adam. Adam was created with the virgin land, and Jesus, from the flesh of the Virgin Mary. God the Father formed Adam with the clay of the earth; the Holy Spirit formed Jesus in the womb of Mary. Both were from God and a virgin mother. But Adam is God’s creation, Jesus is God’s substance. In a similar vein St. John Damascene compares the origin of Eve with that of Jesus. Both Eve and Jesus came into being without the sexual union of man and woman. And Tertullian compares Mary with Eve. Eve believed in the devil’s word and conceived malice and sin; Mary believed in the archangel Gabriel’s word and conceived virtue and salvation for the world. Mary was to be the virgin Mother of God. To be a virgin shows that Jesus was true God, that is, Jesus had no human father. And to be a mother shows that Jesus was a true man. All the above gives us abundant reasons for holding as dogma, as an article of faith, that our Savior Jesus Christ was conceived and born from the Virgin Mary.

Virgin at Jesus’ birth
People have believed that our Blessed Mother lost her virginity on giving birth to Jesus, such as a certain fourth-century Jovinianus, and a number of Protestants at the time of the Reformation. But the Church teaches otherwise in its councils and creeds. When defining Mary’s virginity as a dogma at the Lateran Council in 649, Pope Martin I proclaimed solemnly: Mary is virgin before, during and after the birth of Jesus. Both the prophet Isaiah and St. Matthew said that a virgin would conceive and give birth to a son. On the virginity of our Blessed Mother during the birth of Jesus, the Fathers of the Church also unanimously agreed. St. Gregory Thaumaturgus (the Wonderworker) said about Jesus: “You are born of Mary Virgin. … Her virginity was not an obstacle for your birth, nor did your birth violate her virginity. … Birth and virginity, two contrary things, were united. Because for you, who are the Creator, this is easy and simple.” St. Peter Chrysologus simply wrote: “A virgin conceived, a virgin gives birth, a virgin she remains.” Similar opinions can be gathered from the writings of St. Ignatius Martyr, St. Ephraim, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, St. Ildephonsus of Toledo and others. In its liturgy the Church celebrates Mary’s perpetual virginity. We pray in one of the responsorials for the feast of our Lord’s Presentation: “The virgin conceived and gave birth to a son, yet she remained a virgin forever.” The great theologian St. Thomas Aquinas gives us the reason, stating that Jesus is the Incarnate Word of God. Since he was conceived without corruption in the Virgin Mary, it is also fitting that he be born without corruption of the Mother’s virginity. As our redeemer Jesus came to save us from corruption, so it was not becoming for Jesus to destroy his mother’s virginity. Mary is the Mother of God. If Jesus were born the same way as any other human, how could Mary be God’s mother? Mary is the new Eve, in contrast with the old Eve. After original sin Eve was to give birth in pain and corruption. Mary, the new Eve, without sin, was exempt from the results of original sin.
How did Mary keep her virginity at Jesus’ birth? Jesus was miraculously conceived and miraculously born. St. Athanasius and St. Bernard compare the birth of Jesus from the womb of the Blessed Mother to the rays of the sun going through a window pane, leaving the glass intact. Through God’s power two bodies can be at the same place at the same time. His intervention can suspend the impenetrability of the bodies. After the Resurrection Jesus’ risen body went through closed doors. Today his body and blood are sacramentally in the consecrated hosts. Therefore the virgin conception and virgin birth of Jesus, the God-man, do not present any difficulty for the Lord.

Virgin after Jesus’ birth
All through the centuries people have denied Mary’s perpetual virginity, attributing more children to Mary and Joseph. Yet from ancient times the Church has taught that Jesus, conceived through the power of the Holy Spirit, was the only son Mary had, and that she maintained her virginity all her life. Pope St. Siricius said that God the Father reserved the womb of the Blessed Mother solely for his only-begotten Son. St. Ambrose and St. Thomas Aquinas assigned a spiritual meaning to Ezekiel 44:2: “This gate is to remain closed; it is not to be opened for anyone to enter by it; since the Lord, the God of Israel, has entered by it, it shall remain closed.” Mary is the gate, and Jesus was the only one to enter it. In Luke 1:34 Mary said to the angel: “How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?” This indicates that our Blessed Mother did not intend to have a sexual relationship with any man. In John 19:26 the dying Jesus entrusted his mother to John the Evangelist, saying “Woman, behold your son.” If our Blessed Mother had other children, Jesus would not have done this. Regarding Mary’s virginity after Jesus’ birth, proper exegesis is needed to clear up some confusion. Concerning Jesus’ conception and birth, the words “before,” “until,” and “firstborn” have occasionally cast doubt in people’s minds. The most common error is caused by the term “brothers and sisters” mentioned in the Bible. Some light will be shed on these difficulties.
In Matthew 1:18 we read: “When his mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, but before they lived together, she was found with child through the Holy Spirit.” Mary was with child before she lived together with Joseph, that is to say, before she was brought to Joseph’s home through the wedding ceremonies. This scriptural passage simply indicates that the child Mary carries is not Joseph’s. It says nothing about what happens after the wedding. So it cannot be concluded that Mary and Joseph had sexual relations after the wedding.
Then Matthew 1:25 says that Joseph had no relations with Mary until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus. Again, this verse does not say that Joseph had relations with Mary after the birth of Jesus. It simply states that Joseph had no sexual relations beforehand.
Luke 2:6-7 records: “While they were there, the time came for her to have her child, and she gave birth to her firstborn son.” Some people conclude that, since Jesus is the firstborn son of Mary and Joseph, there must be second, third, fourth children. But this is not the case. The word “firstborn” means that Mary had no child previously, and that Jesus was the first one who came out of Mary’s womb. It does not necessarily demand that Mary had more children. St. Jerome says that every only son is the firstborn.
The most serious problem for many comes from the “brothers and sisters” of Jesus mentioned in the Bible. In John 2:12 we read: “After this, he and his mother, his brothers, and his disciples went down to Capernaum and stayed there only a few days.” In Matthew 13:54-56: “He came to his native place and taught the people in their synagogue. They were astonished and said ‘Where did this man get such wisdom and mighty deeds? Is he not the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother named Mary and his brother James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas? Are not his sisters all with us? Where did this man get all this?’” Luke 8:19: “Then his mother and his brothers came to him but were unable to join him because of the crowd.” Acts 1:14, talking about the first Christian community in Jerusalem, says that they all devoted themselves with one accord to prayer, together with some women, and Mary, the mother of Jesus, and his brothers. And Paul wrote in his First Letter to the Corinthians 9:5: “Do we not have the right to take along a Christian wife, as do the rest of the Apostles, and the brothers of the Lord, and Kephas?”
But we know that in the Gospels our Blessed Mother is always referred to as Jesus’ mother, not the mother of any other man or woman. And Jesus is called the son of Mary, not a son of Mary. In the finding of Jesus in the temple, when Jesus was 12 years old, we see no trace that Mary and Joseph had other children.
How about the people mentioned as Jesus’ brothers and sisters? Who are they? First of all, the term “brother” and “sister” is used in a very broad sense in the Bible. From Genesis 12:5 we know that Lot was the nephew of Abram, later known as Abraham. Thus the verse says: “Abram left Haran, his hometown, and took his wife Sarai, his brother’s son Lot … and they set out for the land of Canaan.” Yet in Genesis 13:8 Lot is considered Abram’s brother: “When dispute broke out between the herdsmen of Abram’s livestock and those of Lot’s, Abram said to Lot, ‘Let there be no dispute between me and you, nor between my herdsmen and yours, for we are brothers’” (See the Jerusalem Bible version). Likewise Laban is the brother of Rebecca, Jacob’s mother. Hence Laban is Jacob’s uncle, but he is called Jacob’s brother (Gen 29:15). In the Song of Songs one’s wife is referred to as his sister: “You have ravished my heart, my sister, my bride; You have ravished my heart with one glance of your eyes, with one bead of your necklace” (Song 4:9). Of course we know that at the Last Judgment Jesus will call all men his brothers, for he will say to those on his right: “Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me” (Matt 26:40).
The names of Jesus’ sisters are not given. But four men are mentioned as Jesus’ brothers. They are James, Joseph, Simon and Judas. Who were they? The Gospel readings shed some light on their identity. In John 19:25 we read: “Standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother’s sister, Mary, the wife of Clopas, and Mary of Magdala.” In Matthew 27:55-56 we read: “There were many women there, looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him. Among them were Mary Magdalene and Mary, the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee.” Here we see the identity of two of the four above mentioned, that is, James and Joseph. They are sons of a Mary who is the wife of Clopas. This Mary is different from our Blessed Mother. So James and Joseph, the so-called brothers of Jesus are not our Lord’s biological brothers. Also in Mark 16:40: “There were also women looking on from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of the younger James and of Joses, and Salome.” Clopas is Greek. Cleophas is Aramaic. Alphaeus in Aramaic can be rendered in Greek as Alphaeus or Clopas. So it seems the Clopas, Cleophas or Alphaeus mentioned in the biblical passages are the same person, the father of James and Joseph, and the husband of the Mary who stood at the foot of the cross with our Blessed Mother. According to Hegesippus, a second-century historian, this Cleophas was St. Joseph’s brother. If this is the case, then James and Joseph, the “brothers of Jesus,” are actually cousins of our Lord. This makes sense, because the Hebrew and Aramaic languages have no word for cousin. (The Hebrew term ahim can mean brother or cousin. The translators of the Septuagint translated it into adelphos, a Greek word meaning brothers, not anepsios, meaning cousins.) Cousins are called brothers. As for the other two names, Simon and Judas, they also may be children of Alphaeus by a previous marriage.
Most Fathers of the Church believe that Mary took a vow of virginity. St. Augustine reasons about Mary’s answer to the announcing angel: “How shall this be done, because I know not man?” She would not have said this unless she had already vowed virginity to God. In his monumental Summa Theologiae St. Thomas Aquinas gives three reasons for Mary’s perpetual virginity: First, Jesus is the Only-Begotten of the Father, so it was becoming that he should be the only-begotten of his Mother. Second, Mary’s virginal womb is the shrine of the Holy Spirit, wherein he had formed the flesh of Christ; wherefore it was unbecoming that intercourse with man should desecrate it. Third, this is derogatory to the dignity and holiness of God’s Mother: For she would seem to be most ungrateful, were she not content with such a Son.
Other defenses of Mary’s perpetual virginity may be found in the writings of Origen, St. Ambrose, St. Peter Chrysologus and St. Ildefonsus of Toledo.
The Church has always professed the truth of Jesus’ virgin birth and the perpetual virginity of our Blessed Mother. In the Creed we assert that Jesus was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary. In the divine office of the feast of the Annunciation we officially pray, “Zion, let your wedding chamber be prepared to receive Christ your King. The Virgin conceived and gave birth to a son, yet she remained a virgin forever. She knelt in worship before her child.” And in chapter VIII of the Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium (On the Church), the Second Vatican Council clearly and amply reaffirmed Jesus’ virginal birth and Mary’s virginity. Mary’s perpetual virginity is an article of faith. We believe it wholeheartedly.

Father John Wang, PhD, is a retired university professor living in Missoula, Montana.
 
Todos los servicios de Catholic.net son gratuitos. Sólo nos mantenemos gracias a los donativos que, voluntariamente, nos hacen algunos de nuestros visitantes. Necesitamos de tu ayuda para continuar anunciando el mensaje de Cristo a través de la Red. Ayúdanos, Dios te lo recompensará.
DA CLICK AQUÍ PARA DONAR
 
     Herramientas del Artículo:
Arriba
.
Ver más artículos del tema
.
Preguntas o comentarios
.
¿En donde estoy?
.
Hacer un donativo
Envíalo a un amigo
.
Formato para imprimir
.
Descargar en PDF
.
Descargarlo a tu Palm
.
  Suscripción canal RSS

Escribir un comentario sobre este artículo

 Nombre

 Email Formato invalido. (no será publicado)

 País

Comentario



Escriba las letras como aparecen



* Gracias por su comentario. El número de mensajes que pueden estar en línea es limitado. La longitud de los comentarios no debe exceder los 500 caracteres. Catholic.net se reserva el derecho de publicación de los mensajes según su contenido y tenor. Catholic.net no se solidariza necesariamente con los comentarios ni las opiniones expresadas por sus usuarios. Catholic.net no publicará comentarios que contengan insultos o ataques y se reserva el derecho de publicar direcciones de correo o enlaces (links) a otras páginas.

 
Inicio | Secciones | Comunidades | Servicios | Consultorios | Alianzas | Foros | Contacto
Servicios por email Servicios por email
Foros Foro para Sacerdotes
Mapas Mapa de Sacerdotes
Opiniones ¿Qué opinas de Catholic.net?
Comentarios Comentarios al editor de esta sección
Biblioteca Documentos de apoyo de Sacerdotes
Preguntas frecuentes Preguntas Frecuentes
Donativos Hacer un donativo
Actualidad en la Iglesia
Año Sacerdotal 2009-2010
Sínodo de la Palabra 2008
El Papa y los cardenales
Los obispos de la Iglesia Católica
Vida sacerdotal
Los diáconos
Homilías
Recursos Pastorales
Sacerdotes y Religiosos
Actividades de la vida del Papa
Cursos de la comunidad de sacerdotes
Doctores de la Iglesia
Documentación para sacerdotes
Año de la Eucaristía (2004-2005)
Infologos
Centro Pastoral Logos
Sacerdos. English
Homily Resources
Retreats
Magazine
Pilgrimages
Hispanic Ministry
Seminary Formation
Magazine Archive
Lista de correo
Mantente al tanto de las novedades, recomendaciones, avisos y artículos de gran interés, que Catholic.net selecciona específicamente para este servicio.

Suscribir
Cancelar suscripción
Consultores de la comunidad
Un servicio exclusivo para sacerdotes. Orientación y acompañamiento espiritual a Sacerdotes. Dudas y cuestiones acerca de la Vida Sacerdotal, la Liturgia, el uso y aplicación del Derecho canónico, la Formación en los seminarios y la Formación permanente del Sacerdote
Ver todos los consultores
Apoyan a la comunidad
Consejo Episcopal Latinoamericano, CELAM
Sagrada Congregación para el Clero
Conferencia Episcopal Ecuatoriana
Esglesia
Conferencia Episcopal Uruguaya

Ver todas las alianzas que apoyan a la comunidad
Encuesta
¿Qué tipo de educación crees que es más adecuada para formar hombres cristianos?
La Educación Tradicional, en la cual el maestro enseña al alumno
El Constructivismo, en el cual el alumno descubre el saber por sí mismo
Cualquiera de las dos
No sé
> Ver resultados
> Ver todas las encuestas
Foro para Sacerdotes
¡Participa!
 |   Homenajes  |   Condiciones de uso   |   Donativos   |   Política de privacidad   |   Publicidad   |   Contáctanos   |  RSS
© 2010 Catholic.net Inc.
Todos los derechos reservados
El lugar de encuentro de los católicos en la red